Can A Christian Believe In Theistic Evolution And Be Saved?


The belief system of Christianity is based upon facts, not blind faith. The Bible teaches that the earth and everything in it was Created in six days just like our own, and that this Creation week took place just a few thousand years ago. Secular scientists, most of which have an anti-supernatural bias, claim everything evolved over long periods of time.

Special Creation is what the Bible teaches. If one reads the Bible alone and does not consider any scientific input, that person will never think evolution was involved in the creation process. So why are there so many in the church who believe that very thing? They believe science is at least as right if not more so than the Bible. The reality is that the Bible is right. Science changes what they hold as truth, the Bible never does. The truths of the Bible are consistent and provable especially since that which is perfect has come in complete revelation.

Evolution Puts Faith In Man

The entire field of evolution is false. There was no big bang. Spinning gas can make neither stars nor planets. Lightning strikes on pond scum cannot alter lifeless chemicals in living cells. Everything reproduces after its own kind, and mutations cannot change a species into a different kind. Variation within a species is not evolution, but is consistent with the Creation model. Darwin observed variations between finches, but everything he noted was still a finch. Evolution, whether astro-physical, chemical, or biological, has had no part to play with the existence of the universe, as well as life on earth.

And still, faithless members of the church doubt the Bible and agree with scientists. They have a hybrid of God’s truth and man’s error, and call it theistic evolution. In other words, evolution explains all that exists, but where the science doesn’t work out, God miraculously helped evolution over the hump. What non-sense. Not only is it factually untrue and Scripturally unviable, but it is fatally false doctrine to boot. Anyone who believes in theistic evolution is lost just as if that person believed in atheistic evolution.

Creation Puts Faith In God

The book of Hebrews says, “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear” (11:3). Whatever is understood here, it is by faith, so look at the beginning of the chapter to see what that involves: “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (11:1). The word “substance” in the Greek is hupostasis, and means “foundation.” This is even clear in the English rendering of “substance” (sub means under, stance means to stand).

Faith is a foundation upon which one builds his hope in the unseen. What makes up this foundation of evidence is the evidence of Scripture, which helps build the foundation of our faith (Romans 10:17). So to understand something by faith is not a blind leap in the dark, nor it is an assumption one feels is right. Faith is not based on some experience that is better felt than told, nor upon something that makes us happy to believe in it. To understand anything by faith is to know it with assurance based upon the evidence.

Saving Faith Believes In Creation

So back to our original text, notice what is understood by faith: “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God.” This is exactly what the Bible says. Not only in Genesis, but throughout the Bible, it mentions that God spoke the created order into existence. This is what the faithful know based upon the facts of the Bible. This is in contrast with what does not play a part in the faithful’s understanding or origins. The verse concludes, “things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” Theistic evolution teaches that things which are seen were indeed made of things which do appear, but God explicitly says it is not that way. In short, faith teaches Special Creation and not theistic evolution. More to the point, faith teaches against theistic evolution.

When one reads a few verses down, one finds, “But without faith it is impossible to please Him” (11:6). It is by faith that one understands that God spoke the universe into existence, just like the Bible says. Equally clear, by faith it is evident that theistic evolution is not only nowhere taught in Scripture, but is itself a belief that is contrary to the Scripture. In short, those who hold to theistic evolution do not have a Biblical faith. And since without faith it is impossible to please God, then those who hold to theistic evolution are displeasing to God. Such a compromise puts such a disbeliever in the same camp as the atheists, and both await the same condemnation at the Day of Judgment.


Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Did God Create Man?


Since God made man, then He did so for a reason. And according to the Bible, God not only crafted humanity with one overarching reason, He has made each one of us as particular and specific individuals with a plan for each of our lives. If the Bible is right and if God made us, then life has meaning and purpose. Solomon concludes that each one of us is made whole and complete when we fear God and keep His commandments, for this is our entire duty and responsibility before God our Creator (Ecclesiastes 12:13).

First Act of Grace

The question of why God made man and the matter of Redemption are bound together. It begins with the nature of God. God is a loving God (First John 4:8). Heaven is the eternal abode of God, and is the greatest of all possible places simply because it is the real presence of God. It is figurately described in Revelation as a place of no sorrow and death where every tear is wiped away (Revelation 21:4). The reality is much greater than the figurative rendering, which is nothing but God condescending with human language to describe that humans cannot understand because of our physical limitations.

Love by its very nature is generous. Love seeks the benefit and welfare of others, even over our own self. Every good thing we have on earth come to us from a good and giving God (James 1:17). Therefore, God, by His own loving and generous nature wants to give the greatest gift He can, which is to share the greatness of Heaven. But with whom can He share, since He alone is eternal? It must be with a created being or beings.

The angels are created beings, and they do share Heaven with God. But this does not suit the primary intentions of God. Angels spend their entire existence in Heaven with God. They have never been anywhere else, with the exception of visits to earth, but the prime residence of angels is still Heaven (Matthew 18:10). Add to this the purpose of angels is to serve God and to minister to us as a part of that Divine service. Angels, always having been in Heaven, could not deny His existence or greatness since they have seen it since they were created. God wants to share the glory of Heaven as a reward for a creation of His that would choose to love and follow Him.

Man and the World

That is why God made man and why He made this earth exactly as He did. God is not in our immediate presence as He is with the angels. But He did not leave His reality hidden from man. From the beginning of time, this world that God had made has been observed by man, and by this observation conclude that this was all made and could not have just happened. This conclusion is so obvious that those who do not come to this conclusion have no excuse (Romans 1:20). No one can say they had no evidence for the existence of God.

God’s special creation not only explains why we exist and why the world exists, but also why it exists as it does. This world and our lives will all have plenty of good and bad, ups and downs. The blessings should make us want to seek and bless the creator of these blessings. The obstacles and frustration in life should make us not want to live just for this world and this life. It should encourage us to seek and better world and a better life, so that we, like the ancient pilgrims and patriarches, realize that this world is not our home, that we all seek a better and Heavenly country.

So God made this world and put us in the middle of it where His presence it not immediate and undeniable, but He did not set Himself too far away either that no one can know if God exists. He placed Himself at the perfect epistemic distance from man so that He could be found by those who chose to seek for Him with all of their heart. This is the point of Paul’s sermon on Mars Hill. God made this world and made all mankind from one blood and has already determined where each of us will live and how long. He did this so that we might decide to search for God, and we so decide, we can seek Him and find Him because He is not far from anyone one of us, because it is in God that we live, move, and exist (Acts 17:24-28).

A Perfect World

At each stage of Creation, Moses records that God ends His day’s work by declaring that what He had made is good. Once He made man, created in His image and given a soul, He said it is all very good. Man is the highest order of God’s creation. God made everything in the universe for the use and benefit of man, mostly spiritual. Therefore, this world is perfect.

That does not mean it is a realm where nothing bad ever happens. It is perfect for God’s intentions. God made this world as the ideal environment for soul-making. We will be suitably blessed with good and challenged with suffering in our one and only lifetime, which is our sole probationary period where our eternity is determined. The matter comes down to a simple thing: submission. If we truly yield to God and obey from the heart and love Him above all, then we will be redeemed from our sins by the blood of Jesus. So to sum it all, God made man so that He can have His creation that He can redeem from sin by our chose to come to Him. And He redeems us so that He can share the wonders of Heaven with Him, or more to the point, share His company and never-ending fellowship.


Posted in apologetics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

What’s Wrong With Kids These Days?


The Millennial Generation has been given a new nickname recently – Snowflakes. It comes from a couple of things. These people have been told their whole lives how special they are, like a snowflake. But when you get a bunch of them together, they just make up a pile of snow with no distinction between flakes. Also, these Millennials are triggered quickly and by the slightest provocation into a Meltdown.

Not all people born into the Millennial Generation are Snowflakes, just like not all young people in the 60s were Hippies. I’m not even convinced that a majority are, but the squeaky wheel gets the grease, and the public malcontents get the notoriety while the normal kids go to school and work with no problem.

After Trump was elected was when we saw Meltdowns on a massive scale on college campuses across the country. America has had over two-hundred years of presidential election, and for that time half the country didn’t get what they wanted. But there has never been such a display over an election until now. It has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the Snowflakes.

Caused By Colleges

Universities used to be a place to encounter many different ideas, even those that challenged yours. Now they are the least diverse place in the world – not by sex, religion, or geography, but by thought. Most colleges today (there are a few exceptions, e.g. University of Chicago) are overrun by Existentialism, Postmodernism, and Marxism. These are the chilly clouds where Snowflakes are formed.

Modernism (first half of the 20th century) questioned everything, but still sought for truth. The result was pluralism where no one was wrong. Postmodernism questions everything, but in a different way and for different reasons. It is intentionally not trying to come to any conclusion, and is certainly not after the truth. Everything is central or marginal. Postmodernists want to pull the rug out what is central (agreed upon truths) and replace it with the marginal, only to do the same to this new central thought. The result is no one is right.

When you question everything and get no answers, you replace objective truth with subjective individual opinion, at best. And even though the result of this process is personal convictions, it has led to the greatest demonstration of groupthink in recent history. Modernism may have been pluralistic, but Postmodernism is Nihilistic. It is a search for nothing and finding it in abundance. This leaves people stuck in an existential crisis of pessimism.

Postmodernists are also Marxist. The root of Marxism is personal identity. With the Postmodern rejection of objectivity and reality, all that is left is personal identity. This is where the Meltdowns come from. When you disagree with a Snowflake, to them it’s not just someone thinking differently, but an attack in the most personal way. Snowflakes have tied their whole personality to their subjective thoughts, or stated in their words, how they identify themselves.

To disagree with a Snowflake is to tell them everything about how they see themselves is invalid. That’s why they take it so personally. It is an attack, they are the victim, and you are guilty of hate speech. This is why Snowflakes want to stomp out all dissenting opinions. It is genuinely dangerous to their fragile egos, and this is why they Meltdown when confronted with the other side of things. There is a new thing in our country, childish tantrums as political discourse.

Caused By Parents

Speaking of childish tantrums, it needs to be made clear that all of this was not caused by our college system. Parents are to blame. The destruction of the home is where this all started. The Snowflakes have been playing tantrum politics for years in pitting divorced/daycare parents against each other.

Tantrums only work only on bad parents. You may remember an episode of “The Andy Griffith Show” where Opie tries throwing fits to get a raise in his allowance and Andy doesn’t budge. Good for him, but there are plenty of parents on whom this does work. These parents spoil their kids over their own guilt. Either they feel badly because of a divorce, or because tossed their kid into daycare even though the two remain married. By this separation from one or both parents, the child never gets true validation. They look for in their own identity.

The nursery has become nothing but a warehouse for developing children, often raised by persons with different value systems than the parents. The child is never really raised in the real sense of the word. They age, but never mature. Snowflakes act like babies because they were never made to grow up. They were all told how special they are. Every student got a happyface sticker on their homework, and everyone on the team got a participation trophy. This does not prepare anyone for the real word, so these people Meltdown when facing life. They are forced to learn the hard way that you can’t be whatever you want if you want it bad enough.

Cured By Scripture

I don’t want to complain and have no answers. That would make me as bad as the Snowflakes I criticize. There is a cure for the Meltdown syndrome. Speak the truth in love to these people and try to show them that there is objective truth, and this truth is in the gospel. I truly believe that other Millennials who have not been licking the backs of frogs should be the perfect sort to try this explanation. And to insure it doesn’t happen to another generation, parents need to be parents as the Bible says. It starts with being a godly spouse for your partner. And then, parents need to teach the Bible in the home to their children (Dt. 6:4-9; Eph. 6:4; II Tim. 1:5, 3:14-15). This will help ground children who can become well-adjusted and profitable adults.

Many of the Snowflakes in their protests against Trump made references to the novel 1984, implying Trump is a dictator. They should have paid better attention in Literature class, because Orwellian does not refer to any totalitarian government. It specifically is a manipulation of language in order to control thought. Now who is the Orwellian, Trump or the politically correct Snowflakes? Attempts to silence what they call hate speech, along with the creation of new words, such as the many terms to describe the countless possible genders, is the new 2+2=5. The answer to this is not found in basic math as much as it is within the Bible – still the most perfect and most practical book ever.


Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

God’s Identity Crisis: Part III – Taking Life


One of the harshest criticisms leveled again God in the Old Testament are His orders to take life, and in particular, large groups, such as the Jews devastating the Canaanites in order to occupy the land. In fact, many have charged God with genocide. Comparisons to the German Holocaust of the Jews are often raised, but this is not a fair comparison and is only intended to disparage and not illustrate.

Did God Commit Genocide?

God never ordered the Jews to annihilate the Canaanites, but to dispossess them. They were to kill those who refuse to be dispossessed. They were not allowed to chase down those who ran away. It was also located to a very specific geography, the land of Canaan. There were people racially similar whom God had not any order to attack and kill, and that’s because they were not living in Canaan, the Hebrew land of promise.

It was much more than they were living in the land God intended for the Jews. They were a wicked people. If you reconsider what we discussed in the Second Part of this series, God has the right to be angry at sin and punish it.

  • The Canaanites practiced “abominable customs” (Leviticus 18:30).
  • They engaged in “detestable things” (Deuteronomy 18:9).
  • Their idolatry involved witchcraft, and they tried to cast spells on people and summon the dead (Deuteronomy 18:10-11).
  • They would even “burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods” (Deuteronomy 12:30).

Add to this that God was long-suffering with these people and gave them time to repent. Going back to the time of Abraham over 400 years prior, they were evil, but it was not yet in full bloom. He patiently waited until the sins of these people were complete before he ordered any action against them (Genesis 15:16).

Innocent Life

And still, critics claim God is blameworthy of evil because oftentimes children were slaughtered along with the adults. The insistence that this is innocent life being taken reckons blame on God, according to the skeptics. These lives are innocent, but upon what basis does the atheist declare this? By denying the Bible as the Word of God, they have also rejected any objective and absolute code for human morality. Therefore, the skeptic has no grounds to say anything in God is wrong since they cannot prove anything is wrong.

What is both ironic and sad is that these same skeptics do not really believe that it is morally wrong to kill all children or to take away all innocent lives. By seeing man in purely a materialistic way, we are no more than a body, just flesh and nothing more. When the unborn child in inconvenient or unwanted, killing it is not only not immoral, it is often called the right thing to do. Life does not being at birth, but at conception, and that is because we are more than flesh. We are all given by God a spirit.

The atheist will sometimes blame God for babies that died in the Canaanite captivity, saying that they lost their life, and this life is all we have. As beings with souls, this life is not all we have. All of those babies killed in Canaan died innocently, and thus are barred from the doom of hell and are guaranteed a place beside God in the eternity of Heaven. If those babies had grown to maturity, there is the greatest probability that they would have become as depraved as all other Canaanite adults.

To this, the atheist often responds that if this is true, then we should kill all babies and make sure they go on to Heaven. That is unreasonable because we, as limited humans, do not know the consequences of all action, unlike God. Some, like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, not only favored abortion, but would justify killing sick children and the elderly. But neither she nor anyone else can tell if that young hemophilic will cure cancer or lead warring nations into peace.

Only God is in the position to legislate the death of innocents because only God knows what will be the consequences of these actions. All life begins with God and we are all in His hand. When we die, our eternal spirit returns to God (Ecclesiastes 12:7). And while we are alive, it is only in God that we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28). If all life belongs to God, He may legitimately determine when a life has or has not achieved its purpose. And from there, God alone may designate when a life may legitimately end. God is not blameworthy for the deaths of the Canaanites, even their innocent children, just as He is not guilty of any wrong for any person who dies even today. Instead of blaming God and being angry with God, we should love and serve Him, and submit to Him with all of our heart.


Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

God’s Identity Crisis: Part II – God’s Anger


When people level the charge that the description of God changes from the Old to the New Testament, they quite often are not so much upset that God seems to change in as much as He was once a mean and angry God. This begs the question, does God ever have the right to be angry? While being overcome with wrath is sinful, we are warned to “be angry and sin not” (Ephesians 4:26). This means that anger in and of itself in not immoral. If a Christian can be justified while in anger, then God may express anger and not be blameworthy for it.

A Jealous God

One of the charges against God is that He is a jealous God, as He claims even for Himself (Exodus 20:5; Deuteronomy 4:24). Jealousy is a vice this world condemns, so worldly people castigate God for being a jealous God. But the Bible word for jealous in both the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament simply means that you want to keep what you possess and are not willing to share.

We teach our children to share their toys, but there are times where this jealousy is not only appropriate, but required, such as in marriage. A man should not want to share his wife with other men. That is adultery. Likewise, God does not want His people to “cheat” on Him with false gods and idols. This is what is meant by God being a jealous God, and there is no inappropriate anger in this.

Paul encourages first century saints to be jealous for, or in other words, greatly desire, to possess spiritual gifts (First Corinthians 12:31; 14:1,39). Also, he says to the same congregation that he is jealous over them with a godly jealousy, in that he does not want them to have anything to do with the lies of the devil (Second Corinthians 11:2). This is nothing like the vice known today as jealousy where a man acts domineering and manipulative towards his wife, or a woman who nags and harangues her husband. This is wrong, but this is not God when He works within His appropriate jealous nature.

The Wrath of God

God’s anger is not like human anger. He never flies off the handle or gets caught up in the heat of the moment. God never gets in the throes of over-expression or the wild swing of emotionalism. His anger is always in response to sin, and therefore, it is always appropriate and rationally retributive.

If one has the notion that the God of the Old Testament was always angry it’s because the Jews were always in rebellion against Him. The Lord is angry every day at sin (Psalm 7:11), and the Jews gave Him every reason to angry with them every day. That does not take away from how God also blessed the Jews in spite of themselves. It also doesn’t change that our God of love as revealed in the New Testament will also condemn sin committed on this side of the cross, as well.

God has the right to be angry. Just like any parent, teacher, employer, or anyone else in authority, when those who should be in submission act instead with rebellion, those in charge can be angry and act upon it without being sinful. The difference is God is never wrong in the wrath He displays, or will display when He judges the world on our final day.

Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

God’s Identity Crisis: Part I – The Bible Got It Right


There are folk out there who are critical of how the Bible depicts God. To them, it seems as if an angry and vengeful God of the Old Covenant went to therapy during the time in between the testaments and came out in the New Covenant as a happy and loving God. This is not so much a criticism against the being or existence of God as much as it against the reliability of Scripture, for there are many who level this charge who still believe in God but not the Bible.

If one reads the whole Bible, they will not come away with this position. They will notice that God is loving and vengeful in both the Old and New Testaments. The only ones who parrot this accusation are those who read criticisms of the Bible, but never take the time to read the Bible for themselves. When it comes to a complete and thorough description of God, the Bible got it right. This makes sense, seeing that the Bible is the Word of God and completely reliable.

God Doesn’t Change

In the Bible, God is described as having many different Divine attributes, such as He is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-holy. Too, He is all-loving while possessing the prerogative of judgment against sin. But more to the point here is that God is immutable, which simply put means God doesn’t change.

The God of the Old Testament is the same God of the New Testament. That means there is as much love with God in the Old Testament as there is the New, and there is as much wrath with God in the New as there is the Old. Many verses attest to God’s unchangeable nature.

  • God is not a man, that He should lie. Neither is He the son of man that He should repent” (Numbers 23:19).
  • I am the Lord. I change not” (Malachi 3:6).
  • Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, and today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).
  • Every good and every perfect gift comes down from the Father of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning” (James 1:17).

God did not change His nature during the intertestamental period. To insist the mean God from the front of the Bible is worthy of rejection, but the God of the back of the Bible is acceptable is foolish, since it is the same God all along. To say otherwise is to disparage the Bible, but it is also a slander against its author, too, our God in Heaven.

Both Merciful and Just

The whole Bible shows a consistent God, one who demonstrates love and one who pours His wrath on sin. There are more passages in the Old Testament that I can list here that show the love of God, so I will list a portion of them.

  • I will make all My goodness pass before thee” (Exodus 33:19).
  • Good and upright is the Lord” (Psalm 25:8).
  • The earth is full of Thy goodness” (Psalm 33:5).
  • The goodness of God endures continually” (Psalm 52:1).
  • The Lord is good. His mercy is everlasting” (Psalm 100:5).
  • I will mention the lovingkindness of the Lord, and the praises of the Lord, according to all that the Lord has bestowed upon us, and the great goodness toward the house of Israel, which He has bestowed upon them according to His mercies and according to the multitude of His lovingkindnesses” (Isaiah 63:7).
  • I am the Lord that executes lovingkindness, justice, and righteousness in the earth, or in these things I delight” (Jeremiah 9:24).
  • The Lord is good to them that wait on Him, to the soul that seeks Him” (Lamentation 3:25).
  • The Lord is good, a stronghold in the day of trouble” (Nahum 1:7).

And as I said, there are many more than these. The point is clear: God is always good. So why does it seem that the Old and New Testaments still read a little differently? While God is the same, the covenants are not. The first is a covenant one is born into, while the second is one choses.

Here’s an illustration. Two men need a fence built. One contracts builders and other asks friends to help. The first man may spell out detailed rules including warnings of what would happen if they loaf on the job or show up late or even not finish. The man who gets friends to help will not need to do that. They help out of love, not contrived obligations. God chose the Jews back then, but most of the Jews never chose God even though they were born into covenant with Him. But Christians come to God out of a free will choice and love. The two Testaments will read a bit differently because the audiences are different, not the God behind them.

Still, God does warn his New Testament saints about awaits the world for its impenitence, as well as for them if they fall away and turn their back on Jesus and the gospel. In a parable, Jesus describes God as angry at those who will kill Him as his Son (Matthew 22:7). God’s vengeance against sin is also seen many times in the book of Revelation (6:16-17, 14:10-11, 15:1,7, 16:19, 19:15). The epistles also show this truth.

  • For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men” (Romans 1:18).
  • Let no man deceive you, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the children of disobedience” (Ephesians 5:6).
  • And to you who are troubled, rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from Heaven with His mighty angels, with flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Second Thessalonians 1:7-8).
  • So I swear in My wrath, they shall not enter into My rest” (Hebrews 3:11).

Always keep in mind that the unchangeable God of Heaven lives and is real, and His holy Word is reliable. Reject either of these, and you will miss out on the future and eternal goodness of God and only know His never ending wrath.

Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Science & Religion


Evolution is not only false, but impossible. It is scientifically unfeasible at every corner. Everything from the beginning of the universe to the beginning of human life cannot be explained by materialistic scientific proposals. All of these have a Divine origin. This is what science itself proves, but not the kind that begins with an anti-supernatural bias.

Science by Mob Rule

Quite often the secularist has tried to frame the debate as if it is science against religion. This tries to paint religion as having no scientific evidence on its side. It also intends to hide how secular materialist science is itself a religion. They treat the theory of evolution like an established fact, and not as it is, a bad theory that requires more blind faith than science.

These secularists will try to act like there should be no discussion because the discussion has already taken place and it’s been settled by all the scientists, as we should go along with the consensus and not reject it. Any new scientific discovery should be poured through the filter of the consensus and not challenge it ever. But a scientific view is not true because it’s popular, but because it has been verified by the scientific method, which evolution has not. No one has ever tested evolution in the lab and have been able to duplicate it.

Science that Advances

Most scientific breakthroughs happened when someone went against the consensus thought. If you must ride the bandwagon to be considered scientifically sound, we would still believe in a flat earth or a geocentric solar system. Physics would not have been changed by Newton and later by Einstein. Almost all medical advances occurred because someone thought outside of the box. Even Darwin’s evolution was at one time unconventional and new.

The advocates of material evolution are serious scientists. They should know better. A theory, by its very definition, is not a universal absolute. It is a possible explanation for something. Knowing evolution is a theory means there may be a possible better explanation, one that fits the facts better. One cannot accept a theory as law, and it certainly should not be held as beyond scrutiny because it is considered the consensus view. The role of science is to search for the truth, even if it is new, even if it is not the popular view at any given time.

The balance between spiritual faith and worldly knowledge is characterized quite well in a quote by Albert Einstein: “Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.”


Posted in apologetics | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments